A case was brought on his behalf because he was jailed for way too long with no charges filed against him along with other issues that were in violation of his Constitutional rights. The evening before his case was to be heard because of the Supreme Court charges were finally filed against him. It really is thought that this is only done so that the Supreme Court would not hear the full case as the Bush Administration would have been found guilty of wrongdoing. Ironically, no charges were filed which had to complete using the allegations of his supposed involvement to detonate a “dirty bomb.” He had been faced with lesser much less specific crimes though Attorney General Ashcroft had stated when he was detained that the data against Padilla was overwhelming. Before he was set to face trial, Padilla’s attorney attempted to argue that due to the torture he had been afflicted by plus the period of time he was detained he was not mentally competent to stand trial. A judge ruled he was eventually found guilty and sentenced to 17 years in prison (Martinez, 2007) that he was competent and.
On Monday April 4th, 2011 the House of Representatives reviewed the Patriot Act and voted to increase it towards the 8th of December, giving the ability to your Federal Bureau of Investigation and several other federal agencies to still use roving wiretaps among other powers that overstep our rights that are constitutional. February 28th, 2011 was considered to be the final day of the Patriot Act since no legislation that is new been passed. With this specific extension, America waits for hearings to be held by the Judiciary Committee. When it came right down to voting for the extension many Republicans voted because of it and Democrats argued against the extension. However, what was a shock to many was the undeniable fact that sixty-five Democrats voted for the extension associated with the Patriot Act. One out of particular, Democratic Representative C. A. Dutch Ruppersberger from Maryland, the best democrat that is ranking the Intelligence Committee, wish to see this extension all the way right through to 2013. A number of the 27 Republicans who voted up against the extension, such as for example Dana Rohrabacher, believe the American people will face a legitimate danger of out-of-control prosecutions as well as the likelihood of out-of-control spy networks taking effect.
Groups like the privacy that is electronic Center (EPIC) while the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) are fighting for reform regarding the Patriot Act. The ACLU believes that law enforcement agencies will take advantage of the balance and employ of this power to trouble innocent members of the communities that are muslim-American. On March 30th, 2011, the ACLU appeared prior to the House subcommittee in the dependence on reform regarding the Patriot Act, arguing that the federal government track of communications without any proof is a violation regarding the peoples that are american basic Amendment rights. Senator Patrick Leahy felt because it did nothing to uphold the government’s accountability that he would not support the extension. EPIC used the Freedom of Information Act (FOIP) to have reports on intelligence law violations through the Intelligence Oversight Board. EPIC has spoken on more than one occasion towards the Senate Judiciary Committee to require the Attorney General to report to Congress any unlawful investigations under the Patriot Act, yet this battle still continues today.
For example, foreigners who seek education through grants, non-citizens looking to gain residency that is permanent citizenship, visas and work permits in the United States are being scrutinized underneath the new requirement system associated with Patriot Act. One quite high ranking official in the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) made it clear then they will receive disapproval if there are any doubts regarding an applicant’s eligibility. More government that is stringent and thorough background checks are only another obstacle developed by the Patriot Act. These rules that are new the Patriot Act also opposed to all of the checks and balances through the Bill of Rights that was put into place to protect citizens’ privacy. A discomfort in what they do because their actions are subject to review if the government suspects they are engaging in anything terrorist related at that time, misuse of surveillance powers by law enforcement agencies were uncovered, including the 1974 revelation that the FBI and foreign intelligence agencies had spied on over 10,000 U.S. citizens, including Martin Luther King Jr. Today, citizens utilizing the internet in the privacy of their home feel. For internet surfers, it opens the entranceway for widespread surveillance of web surfing, e-mails and systems that are peer-to-peer. Also place in the middle of the arguments are companies and libraries that are public need certainly to turn over any potentially incriminating documents accessed through their systems, in the request of federal police force agencies, without giving any notification for their write my paper customers.
I really believe that one aspects of the Patriot Act are feasible, but just with intensive oversight not just from Congress, but also through the Supreme Court. Congress can play a role by making sure the laws they pass do not not in favor of the protections promised to Americans when you look at the First, Fourth, Fifth, Ninth, and Fourteenth Amendments regarding the Constitution. The Supreme Court could continue steadily to review cases to make sure that the Constitution is upheld even though it comes to cases that deal with suspected terrorists which can be American citizens. Our laws are making this country what it is today however it is feared that money maybe the downfall of our nation. The freedom of life, liberty and property has converted into greed. Terrorist acts from the US terrify many Americans, however in many cases, power and money scares them more. The people vote to own government representation but the social people must be more associated with the decision making process. As americans to make sure that those people do not remain in office if you elect someone to office and they do not do the job correctly, it is up to us. That may simply be done if people get more mixed up in political process and not just be satisfied with what are the results.
The expression “land regarding the free” can be used too generously. The way in which it is now, the Patriot Act goes against everything that this country stands for and deprives all of us of your civil liberties. Some argue you cannot give limitless power to a few and expect things to turn out well that it is necessary to maintain order, but. In the event that Patriot Act is usually to be kept as law, the individuals it accountable who overstep or abuse the power given to them that we elect to the House of Representatives (House) and Senate need to hold the people who use. Also, the president really should not be the deciding factor in deeming an individual a “threat” or “enemy combatant” when giving a person such a title strips them of basic human rights. They are occupying, it should be unacceptable for authorities to use tactics that are considered torture when trying to elicit information from an individual, whether that person be an American citizen or not if it is unacceptable for soldiers in war to commit crimes against the people of the nation.
The protection of our nation is the highest therefore the most responsibility that is important of government. The laws created are supposed to be within the interest that is best for the citizens. The power to look after their welfare and to protect them after all, the citizens give the government. Individuals with this known standard of power sometimes pay attention to your whole without rational in addition to individual has got to pay the cost. There should be a limit on the power of this government, if the way that is nation’s of, liberty and pursuit of property come in jeopardy we have to consider the rational the federal government uses when governing this nation. We can not as a nation just sit back and accept what exactly is being done. In order to elicit change, we have to stand up and do some worthwhile thing about it.